Upcoming Reviews

Displaying 51 - 100 of 591.
Institution Review Type Staff Liaison Season Yearsort descending
Biola University Interim Report

Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern.

Maureen Maloney Spring 2019
California Baptist University Accreditation Visit
Maureen Maloney Spring 2019
California Institute of Integral Studies Progress Report
Mark Goor Spring 2019
California State University Maritime Academy Accreditation Visit
Lori Williams Spring 2019
California State University, Bakersfield Offsite Review
Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2019
California State University, Bakersfield Accreditation Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Fall 2019
California State University, Stanislaus Accreditation Visit
Tamela Hawley Spring 2019
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Offsite Review
Maureen Maloney Spring 2019
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Accreditation Visit
Maureen Maloney Fall 2019
California State University, Chico Accreditation Visit
Richard Osborn Spring 2019
California State University, Fullerton Offsite Review
Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2019
California State University, Fullerton Accreditation Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Fall 2019
California State University, East Bay Progress Report
Richard Osborn Spring 2019
California State University, Los Angeles Accreditation Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2019
California State University, San Bernardino Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Mark Goor Spring 2019
Chaminade University of Honolulu Accreditation Visit
Tamela Hawley Spring 2019
Chapman University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Mark Goor Spring 2019
Concordia University Irvine Progress Report
Lori Williams Spring 2019
San Diego Christian College Special Visit
Tamela Hawley Spring 2019
Cogswell Polytechnical College Special Visit
Mark Goor Fall 2019
Cogswell Polytechnical College Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Mark Goor Spring 2019
Notre Dame de Namur University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Tamela Hawley Spring 2019
Dominican University of California Progress Report
Richard Osborn Spring 2019
Dominican School of Philosophy and Theology Accreditation Visit
Lori Williams Spring 2019
Fielding Graduate University Progress Report
Mark Goor Spring 2019
Fuller Theological Seminary Accreditation Visit
Maureen Maloney Spring 2019
Golden Gate University Accreditation Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2019
Graduate Theological Union Interim Report

Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern.

Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2019
Hawaii Pacific University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Richard Osborn Spring 2019
Hawaii Pacific University Special Visit
Richard Osborn Fall 2019
Holy Names University Special Visit
Maureen Maloney Spring 2019
Menlo College Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Richard Osborn Spring 2019
Mills College Offsite Review
Tamela Hawley Spring 2019
Mills College Accreditation Visit
Tamela Hawley Fall 2019
National University Offsite Review
Richard Osborn Spring 2019
National University Accreditation Visit
Richard Osborn Fall 2019
Pacific Oaks College Special Visit
Tamela Hawley Fall 2019
Pacific School of Religion Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Mark Goor Spring 2019
Pacific Union College Interim Report

Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern.

Maureen Maloney Fall 2019
Pitzer College Accreditation Visit
Richard Osborn Spring 2019
Saint Mary's College of California Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Richard Osborn Spring 2019
San Francisco Art Institute Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Mark Goor Spring 2019
San Francisco Conservatory of Music Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Tamela Hawley Spring 2019
San Jose State University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Richard Osborn Spring 2019
University of California, Davis Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2019
University of California, Los Angeles Offsite Review
Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2019
University of California, Los Angeles Accreditation Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Fall 2019
University of California San Diego Offsite Review
Richard Osborn Spring 2019
University of California San Diego Accreditation Visit
Richard Osborn Fall 2019
University of California, Santa Cruz Interim Report

Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern.

Barbara Gross Davis Fall 2019

Pages