Upcoming Reviews
Primary tabs
Institution![]() |
Review Type | Staff Liaison | Season | Year |
---|---|---|---|---|
Abu Dhabi University | Offsite Review | Mark Goor | Fall | 2021 |
Abu Dhabi University | Accreditation Visit | Mark Goor | Spring | 2022 |
Academy for Jewish Religion California | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2023 |
Academy for Jewish Religion California | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2024 |
Academy for Jewish Religion California |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2021 |
Academy of Art University | Accreditation Visit | Mark Goor | Spring | 2021 |
Alder Graduate School of Education | Offsite Review | Mark Goor | Spring | 2024 |
Alder Graduate School of Education | Accreditation Visit | Mark Goor | Fall | 2024 |
Alder Graduate School of Education |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Mark Goor | Spring | 2021 |
Alder Graduate School of Education |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Mark Goor | Spring | 2021 |
Alliant International University | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2028 |
Alliant International University | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2028 |
Alliant International University |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2023 |
Alliant International University | Progress Report | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2021 |
AMDA College of the Performing Arts | Seeking Accreditation Visit | Mark Goor | Spring | 2022 |
American Conservatory Theater | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Spring | 2025 |
American Conservatory Theater | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2025 |
American Conservatory Theater | Special Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2021 |
American Film Institute | Progress Report | Christopher Oberg | Fall | 2021 |
American Film Institute | Offsite Review | Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2023 |
American Film Institute | Accreditation Visit | Christopher Oberg | Fall | 2023 |
American Jewish University |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Tamela Hawley | Spring | 2021 |
American Jewish University | Offsite Review | Tamela Hawley | Fall | 2023 |
American Jewish University | Accreditation Visit | Tamela Hawley | Spring | 2024 |
American University of Armenia | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2023 |
American University of Health Sciences | Offsite Review | Maureen Maloney | Fall | 2022 |
American University of Health Sciences | Accreditation Visit | Maureen Maloney | Spring | 2023 |
Amity University Uttar Pradesh | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
Amity University Uttar Pradesh | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2022 |
Anglo-American University | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
Anglo-American University | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2022 |
Art Center College of Design |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2021 |
Art Center College of Design | Offsite Review | Christopher Oberg | Fall | 2024 |
Art Center College of Design | Accreditation Visit | Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2025 |
Art Center College of Design |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2021 |
Azusa Pacific University | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
Azusa Pacific University | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2022 |
Biola University | Progress Report | Maureen Maloney | Fall | 2023 |
Biola University | Offsite Review | Maureen Maloney | Fall | 2025 |
Biola University |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Maureen Maloney | Spring | 2021 |
Biola University | Accreditation Visit | Maureen Maloney | Spring | 2026 |
Brandman University | Offsite Review | Maureen Maloney | Spring | 2022 |
Brandman University | Accreditation Visit | Maureen Maloney | Fall | 2022 |
Brigham Young University-Hawaii | Offsite Review | Linda Petersen | Fall | 2024 |
Brigham Young University-Hawaii | Accreditation Visit | Linda Petersen | Spring | 2025 |
Brigham Young University-Hawaii |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Linda Petersen | Spring | 2021 |
Brigham Young University-Hawaii |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Linda Petersen | Spring | 2021 |
Cal Northern School of Law | Offsite Review | Maureen Maloney | Spring | 2025 |
Cal Northern School of Law | Accreditation Visit | Maureen Maloney | Fall | 2025 |
Cal Northern School of Law | Special Visit | Maureen Maloney | Spring | 2023 |