Upcoming Reviews

Displaying 51 - 100 of 526.
Institution Review Type Staff Liaison Season Yearsort descending
Azusa Pacific University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Richard Osborn Spring 2018
Azusa Pacific University Progress Report
Richard Osborn Spring 2018
Brandman University Interim Report

Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern.

Maureen Maloney Fall 2018
Brandman University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Maureen Maloney Spring 2018
California Baptist University Offsite Review
Maureen Maloney Spring 2018
California Baptist University Accreditation Visit
Maureen Maloney Fall 2018
California Health Sciences University Progress Report
Maureen Maloney Spring 2018
California Institute of Advanced Management Seeking Accreditation Visit
Richard Osborn Fall 2018
California Institute of Integral Studies Special Visit
Mark Goor Spring 2018
California Lutheran University Progress Report
Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
California Southern University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Mark Goor Spring 2018
California Southern University Progress Report
Mark Goor Fall 2018
California State University Maritime University Offsite Review
Lori Williams Fall 2018
California State University, Chico Offsite Review
Richard Osborn Fall 2018
California State University, Dominguez Hills Accreditation Visit
Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
California State University, Long Beach Progress Report
Lori Williams Spring 2018
California State University, Los Angeles Offsite Review
Barbara Gross Davis Fall 2018
California State University, Monterey Bay Offsite Review
Mark Goor Fall 2018
California State University, Stanislaus Offsite Review
Tamela Hawley Fall 2018
Chaminade University of Honolulu Offsite Review
Tamela Hawley Fall 2018
Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science Accreditation Visit
Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
Claremont Graduate University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2018
Claremont Lincoln University Special Visit
Lori Williams Fall 2018
Coleman University Seeking Accreditation Visit
Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
Dominican School of Philosophy and Theology Offsite Review
Lori Williams Fall 2018
Dominican University of California Accreditation Visit
Richard Osborn Spring 2018
FIDM/Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising Offsite Review
Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
FIDM/Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising Accreditation Visit
Tamela Hawley Fall 2018
Fielding Graduate University Accreditation Visit
Mark Goor Spring 2018
Franciscan School of Theology Progress Report
Tamela Hawley Fall 2018
Fresno Pacific University Special Visit
Tamela Hawley Fall 2018
Fresno Pacific University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
Fuller Theological Seminary Offsite Review
Maureen Maloney Fall 2018
Gateway Seminary of the Southern Baptist Convention Offsite Review
Richard Osborn Spring 2018
Gateway Seminary of the Southern Baptist Convention Accreditation Visit
Richard Osborn Fall 2018
Golden Gate University Offsite Review
Barbara Gross Davis Fall 2018
High Tech High Graduate School of Education Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Mark Goor Spring 2018
Humboldt State University Accreditation Visit
Maureen Maloney Spring 2018
International Technological University Accreditation Visit
Mark Goor Spring 2018
John Paul the Great Catholic University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
Kaiser Permanente School of Allied Health Sciences Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Christopher Oberg Spring 2018
Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences Accreditation Visit
Maureen Maloney Spring 2018
La Sierra University Accreditation Visit
Lori Williams Spring 2018
Life Pacific College Offsite Review
Maureen Maloney Spring 2018
Life Pacific College Accreditation Visit
Maureen Maloney Fall 2018
Marshall B. Ketchum University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
Marshall B. Ketchum University Progress Report
Tamela Hawley Fall 2018
Marymount California University Special Visit
Richard Osborn Spring 2018
Menlo College Special Visit
Richard Osborn Fall 2018
Meridian University Progress Report
Richard Osborn Spring 2018

Pages