Upcoming Reviews

Displaying 101 - 150 of 526.
Institution Review Type Staff Liaison Season Yearsort descending
Mount Saint Mary's University Interim Report

Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern.

Maureen Maloney Fall 2018
NewSchool of Architecture and Design Offsite Review
Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2018
NewSchool of Architecture and Design Accreditation Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Fall 2018
Northcentral University Progress Report
Lori Williams Spring 2018
Northcentral University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Lori Williams Spring 2018
Northern Marianas College Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Maureen Maloney Spring 2018
Notre Dame de Namur University Progress Report
Tamela Hawley Fall 2018
Occidental College Progress Report
Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
Otis College of Art and Design Accreditation Visit
Lori Williams Spring 2018
Pacific College of Oriental Medicine Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
Pacific Union College Accreditation Visit
Maureen Maloney Spring 2018
Pacifica Graduate Institute Accreditation Visit
Richard Osborn Spring 2018
Palo Alto University Accreditation Visit
Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
Patten University Offsite Review
Lori Williams Spring 2018
Patten University Accreditation Visit
Lori Williams Fall 2018
Phillips Graduate University Special Visit
Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
Pitzer College Offsite Review
Richard Osborn Fall 2018
Presidio Graduate School Offsite Review
Richard Osborn Fall 2018
Providence Christian College Accreditation Visit
Mark Goor Spring 2018
San Francisco Art Institute Progress Report
Mark Goor Fall 2018
San Francisco Conservatory of Music Progress Report
Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
San Francisco State University Interim Report

Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern.

Richard Osborn Spring 2018
San Francisco State University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Richard Osborn Spring 2018
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Mark Goor Spring 2018
Saybrook University Accreditation Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2018
Scripps College Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2018
Scripps College Interim Report

Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern.

Barbara Gross Davis Fall 2018
Shepherd University Seeking Accreditation Visit
Maureen Maloney Spring 2018
Simpson University Special Visit
Mark Goor Fall 2018
St. John's Seminary in California Accreditation Visit
Richard Osborn Spring 2018
St. Patrick's Seminary and University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2018
St. Patrick's Seminary and University Special Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2018
Stanford University Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2018
The Broad Center Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Richard Osborn Spring 2018
The Master's University and Seminary Accreditation Visit
Tamela Hawley Spring 2018
The Santa Barbara and Ventura Colleges of Law Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Maureen Maloney Spring 2018
The Wright Institute Offsite Review
Mark Goor Fall 2018
Touro University California Accreditation Visit
Mark Goor Spring 2018
Touro University Worldwide Progress Report
Christopher Oberg Spring 2018
Touro University Worldwide Special Visit
Christopher Oberg Spring 2018
United Arab Emirates University Special Visit
Richard Osborn Fall 2018
United States International University-Africa Offsite Review
Mark Goor Spring 2018
United States International University-Africa Accreditation Visit
Mark Goor Fall 2018
United States University Special Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Fall 2018
University of Antelope Valley Special Visit
Richard Osborn Spring 2018
University of California, Davis Special Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2018
University of California, Merced Accreditation Visit
Barbara Gross Davis Spring 2018
University of California, Riverside Offsite Review
Christopher Oberg Spring 2018
University of California, Riverside Accreditation Visit
Christopher Oberg Fall 2018
University of California, Santa Barbara Mid-Cycle Review

The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)).

Richard Osborn Spring 2018

Pages