Upcoming Reviews
Primary tabs
Institution | Review Type |
Staff Liaison![]() |
Season | Year |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pacifica Graduate Institute | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2024 |
Pacifica Graduate Institute |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Susan Opp | Spring | 2022 |
Marymount California University | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Spring | 2021 |
Marymount California University | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
CETYS University | Progress Report | Susan Opp | Fall | 2022 |
CETYS University | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Fall | 2026 |
CETYS University | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2027 |
CETYS University |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Susan Opp | Spring | 2022 |
CETYS University | Progress Report | Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
Meridian University | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Fall | 2022 |
Meridian University | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2023 |
Logos Evangelical Seminary | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Spring | 2025 |
Logos Evangelical Seminary | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2025 |
Logos Evangelical Seminary |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Susan Opp | Spring | 2022 |
Presidio Graduate School | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Spring | 2025 |
Presidio Graduate School | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2025 |
Presidio Graduate School | Special Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2021 |
Presidio Graduate School |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Susan Opp | Spring | 2023 |
University of Antelope Valley | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Spring | 2021 |
University of Antelope Valley | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
Los Angeles Pacific University | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Spring | 2023 |
Los Angeles Pacific University | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2023 |
Los Angeles Pacific University |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
Los Angeles Pacific University |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Susan Opp | Spring | 2021 |
Anglo-American University | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
Anglo-American University | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2022 |
Amity University Uttar Pradesh | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
Amity University Uttar Pradesh | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2022 |
United Arab Emirates University | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Spring | 2021 |
United Arab Emirates University | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
California Institute for Human Science | Seeking Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2021 |
Reiss-Davis Graduate School | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Fall | 2025 |
Reiss-Davis Graduate School | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2026 |
Reiss-Davis Graduate School |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Susan Opp | Spring | 2023 |
Reiss-Davis Graduate School | Special Visit | Susan Opp | Spring | 2022 |
California Institute of Advanced Management | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Spring | 2024 |
California Institute of Advanced Management | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2024 |
California Institute of Advanced Management |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Susan Opp | Spring | 2022 |
California University of Science and Medicine | Seeking Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2021 |
Institute of Buddhist Studies | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Spring | 2025 |
Institute of Buddhist Studies | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2025 |
Institute of Buddhist Studies |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Susan Opp | Spring | 2021 |
Institute of Buddhist Studies |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Susan Opp | Spring | 2023 |
Design Institute of San Diego | Offsite Review | Susan Opp | Spring | 2023 |
Design Institute of San Diego | Accreditation Visit | Susan Opp | Fall | 2023 |
Design Institute of San Diego |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Susan Opp | Spring | 2021 |