Upcoming Reviews
Primary tabs
Institution | Review Type |
Staff Liaison![]() |
Season | Year |
---|---|---|---|---|
University of California, Los Angeles | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2029 |
University of California, Los Angeles | Progress Report | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2022 |
University of California, Santa Cruz | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2025 |
University of California, Santa Cruz | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2025 |
University of Guam | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2023 |
University of Guam | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2024 |
University of Hawai’i at Mānoa | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2021 |
University of California, Los Angeles |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2025 |
University of California, Santa Cruz |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2021 |
University of Southern California | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2021 |
Whittier College | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2022 |
Southern California University of Health Sciences |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2021 |
Southern California University of Health Sciences | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2022 |
Southern California University of Health Sciences | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2023 |
NewSchool of Architecture and Design | Progress Report | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2021 |
NewSchool of Architecture and Design | Special Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2022 |
NewSchool of Architecture and Design | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2024 |
NewSchool of Architecture and Design | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2024 |
NewSchool of Architecture and Design |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2022 |
American University of Armenia | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2023 |
American University of Armenia | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2023 |
United States University | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2021 |
United States University | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2022 |
University of California, Merced | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2027 |
University of California, Merced | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2028 |
University of California, Merced |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2021 |
University of California, Merced |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2023 |
Academy for Jewish Religion California | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2023 |
Academy for Jewish Religion California | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2024 |
Academy for Jewish Religion California |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2021 |
Teachers College of San Joaquin | Progress Report | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2022 |
Teachers College of San Joaquin | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2024 |
Teachers College of San Joaquin | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2025 |
Teachers College of San Joaquin |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2021 |
New York Film Academy | Offsite Review | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2024 |
New York Film Academy | Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2025 |
New York Film Academy | Special Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2021 |
New York Film Academy |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Barbara Gross Davis | Spring | 2022 |
California Western School of Law | Seeking Accreditation Visit | Barbara Gross Davis | Fall | 2021 |
Art Center College of Design | Offsite Review | Christopher Oberg | Fall | 2024 |
Art Center College of Design | Accreditation Visit | Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2025 |
Art Center College of Design |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2021 |
Art Center College of Design |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2021 |
Point Loma Nazarene University | Offsite Review | Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2027 |
Point Loma Nazarene University | Accreditation Visit | Christopher Oberg | Fall | 2027 |
Point Loma Nazarene University | Progress Report | Christopher Oberg | Fall | 2022 |
Point Loma Nazarene University |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2023 |
Sonoma State University | Offsite Review | Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2025 |
Sonoma State University | Accreditation Visit | Christopher Oberg | Fall | 2025 |
Sonoma State University | Special Visit | Christopher Oberg | Spring | 2021 |