Statement of Accreditation Status
California Northstate University
Each institution is assigned a staff liaison who is their primary point of contact for accreditation activities.
WSCUC Standards require that institutions regularly generate, evaluate, and make public data about student achievement, including measures of retention, and graduation, and evidence of student learning.
Accredited- Indicates that the Commission has found that an institution has met or exceeded the expectations of the Standards and the Core Commitments to Institutional Capacity and Educational Effectiveness. Initial accreditation is for a period of five to seven years before the next comprehensive review. Reaffirmation is granted for a period of seven to ten years and may be accompanied by a request for interim reports and/or special visits, or a formal Notice of Concern.
Candidacy is a status of preliminary affiliation with the Senior College and University Commission, awarded for a maximum of four years following a procedure for institutional review that includes self-study and on-site visitation. Candidacy indicates that the institution meets all or nearly all the Standards at a minimum level. Candidacy is not accreditation and does not ensure eventual accreditation; it means that an institution is progressing toward accreditation. This is the date that the institution was first granted the status of Candidacy with WSCUC. Not all institutions have become accredited with WSCUC through the Candidacy process.
Date the institution was first accredited by WSCUC.
Institutions within the WSCUC region are classified as Non-profit, For-profit or State-supported.
Choices include: No related entity, Proprietary with Parent Board, Religious Control, Multi-institutional system, Other. For more information please see the Related Entities Policy.
The period of time generally extending from September to June; usually equated to 2 semesters or trimesters, 3 quarters, or the period covered by a 4-1-4 calendar system.
Role![]() |
Name | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
Accreditation Liaison Officer | Karen Mcclendon | VP of Institutional Research, Quality and Assessment | kmcclendon [at] cnsu.edu |
Board of Directors Chair | Jim Walsh | President of the Board of Trustees | info [at] cnsu.edu |
Chief Academic Officer | Catherine Yang | Chief Academic Officer | catherine.yang [at] cnsu.edu |
Chief Executive Officer | Alvin Cheung | President | ah10811cheung [at] gmail.com |
Chief Financial Officer | Shoua Xiong | CFO | sxiong [at] cnsu.edu |
Director Institutional Research | Karen Mcclendon | VP of Institutional Research, Quality and Assessment | kmcclendon [at] cnsu.edu |
OPEID |
Location Name![]() |
City | Location Type | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
California Northstate University | Elk Grove | Main Campus | Active | |
Rancho Cordova | Rancho Cordova | Additional | Active |
Degree![]() |
Degree Level | Year Implemented | Modality |
---|---|---|---|
BS in Health Sciences | Bachelors | 2015 | On-Site |
Doctor of Medicine | Professional Doctorate | 2015 | On-Site |
Doctor of Pharmacy | Professional Doctorate | 2008 | On-Site |
Doctor of Psychology | Professional Doctorate | 2018 | On-Site |
Doctor of Psychology | Professional Doctorate | 2018 | On-Site |
Master's of Pharmaceutical Sciences Program | Masters | 2018 | On-Site |
Masters of Arts in Clinical Psychology | Masters | 2019 | On-Site |
Pre-Medical Post-Baccalaureate | Non-degree | 2015 | On-Site |
Season | Year | Review Type |
---|---|---|
Spring | 2021 |
Mid-Cycle Review
The Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) is a review of each institution near the midpoint of its period of accreditation, focusing particularly on student achievement. The Review is performed by WSCUC staff, and draws on evidence from an update of the institution’s Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators and retention and graduation data, as well as any trends emerging from Annual Reports to surface any potential issues across the Standards. The overall purpose of the Mid-Cycle Review is to "identify problems with an institution's or program's continued compliance with agency standards" while "tak[ing] into account institutional or program strengths and stability" (U.S. Department of Education, §602.19(b)). |
Fall | 2021 |
Interim Report
Interim Reports focus on specific issues of concern identified as part of the comprehensive review process, annual report submission, the complaint process, substantive change, or other interactions with the Commission. The purpose of Interim Reports is to ensure that institutions continue to meet the Core Commitments and Standards with respect to the identified areas of concern. |
Fall | 2024 | Offsite Review |
Spring | 2025 | Accreditation Visit |
No external resources are available for this institution.